I want today Leave about a theory that forms the foundation of many of my considerations and conclusions.
About a year ago I met a friend on the idea of applying the mechanisms of evolution to the Darwinian principle of all existence.
order to create first a little clarity about the conditions of which I go out I would like to begin again explain the workings of evolution theory of Charles Darwin and the Veerbung through the transfer of DNA, as I understand it:
place to be a species from which nourished exclusively on leaves of a certain kind of trees. I call these times the Blaetterfresser species, the trees and their leaves Gruenbaeume are the Gruenblaetter. In the Gruenbaeumen the leaves start at an average height of about one meter. The whole tree is on average 5 feet tall. The Blaetterfresser are usually so large that if they lift their head, from below the Gruenblaetter just reach just yet.
reproduce when two Blaetterfresser, the combined DNA of both parents new to the DNA of the child. If this recombination occurs randomly "errors" which are called mutations. What impact this will have on the child varies greatly.
A POSSIBILITY would be that they lead to lower growth.
But that is fatal for a Blaetterfresser, because they also come with a normal size only just make it vital to the Gruenblaetter. The result is offensichtlch. The diminutive animal is it difficult to feed on and thus a lower chance of survival.
ie again less chance to reproduce.
reproduction is for the Blaetterfresser the only way to get to their genetic information about their lifetime also, as for all known organisms. No good news for the small obscurities Blaetterfresser. The probability that the genes make it into a next generation, are below average. This may not be as enjoyable for those affected, but advantageous for the whole species. Because the more individuals with smaller chance of survival, the more more strongly the existence of the species is threatened. Disadvantage are not through in the genes.
could
As a counter example, the child of two Blaetterfresser but also the victim of a mutation that makes him grow exceptionally high.
That would be of enormous benefit, because that not only the lowest Gruenblaetter stalls as food aid, but some who were in the custody of the higher. This results in an average diet over the following which implies an above-average health, from which follow above-average opportunities for reproduction and thus above-average probability to be that "growth differential" prevails.
Advantageous genes share by then.
The model the Blaetterfresser I have indeed made up, but the principle is in reality always the same. Since it is not always about leaves and Koerpergroesse, but about all types of properties and environmental conditions, can be generally said that a better adaptability to the environment in the long term prevails.
These are the so-called natural selection.
Darwin referred in his book "The Origin of Life" in living things.
But is this really necessary?
If you look closely, one finds natural selection everywhere.
found on the beach, the finest sand on the furthest away from the water, WHILE in the height of the waves are often more stones, as if they would be sorted. One can easily explain how it can happen when you look at the hydro, the mass of the stones and the slope of the beach.
At this place we are not interested in the details. It is enough to know that natural forces have led to a selection.
Natural selection can occur so on even in inanimate objects.
Another example would be moral, religions and ideologies. How
organisms can spread or be forgotten.
depending on whether they take over many people, whether they are adaptable and are in harmony with others how much they "Gesellschaft developments. But time is selected completely natural.
Natural selection is therefore not bound to DNA or to a specific type of Fortpfanzung.
On closer inspection, we came to the conclusion that there can be no existence without natural selection.
An object that is in an environment exists, always with a certain degree of harmony with it. By that I mean, the environmental nuisance in some degree the state of the object. The stronger the noise factor, the more the object in conflict with his environment. The perturbation leads to the alteration of the object and the environment towards a more harmonious state. Properties of object and environment are selected so automatically, so that they act against each other less. Clearly, one can these
, Shown on a stream clear. The water fits the different resistances of the soil and vegetation, while it erodes soil and stones in return, smooth drag.
summary could be evolution by natural selection to be regarded as a universal principle. It therefore makes sense to put about, whether it is from constituting a natural law.
natural laws (www.wissen.de) are
According to the Internet Encyclopedia www.wissen.de described as attempts by natural laws of man, "the inner laws of nature be put into function relationships.
So for example, the known relationship between mass and energy with the formula:
E = m * c ^ 2
And in words:
mass converted into energy, is the product of this mass with the square of the speed of light.
The following is more speculation than on sound knowledge built Conclusions: The usual laws of nature
describe in my view, only relations of physical quantities, such as energy, forces, or fields. There are also a number of constants, which are regarded as given by nature and are valid for the whole universe.
constants (www.szallies.de)
natural selection but I see as a process that has no fixed relation to any natural laws.
For what is under consideration in a case seen as object and as an environment which is a question of interpretation. Ultimately, everything can take both roles. However, I have
also not a good idea where to classify natural selection, if you can not even put into a classical function.
0 comments:
Post a Comment