I'm ahead 'n few days by accident on the NASA Web site on Wikipedia and there about the most intricate ways irgendwannmal encountered terms such as natural philosophy , determinism , naturalism physicalism , mechanicism , Analytical ontology and others, that I interest and ignorance half times down have.
And look: That, with which my brain is busy (especially before coupla years), many lonely hours, is written in it as very precise and well combined. Geil! I knew nichmal, hot as all my theories, and now I find them in detail on the web.
Then I felt myself so little n, as if I had 20 years (almost) lived alone on a desert island, at the end stated that sits on the other side of the island civilization.
The definition of the NASA I will now probably never forget: D
the crap I tell not only because my self need to communicate so much is, but also because I have the need, some Maybe - interested in my reader / Freundes-/Familienkreis something cool to show for self-employment. So if you
n bit interested in philosophical and never with the above terms and ideas were so nem face can be read so's time. Can be quite exciting when is purely puts itself:)
And who is to rouse you to read this philosophy text, which it's about too complicated, here n few pages that explain it in some cases, easier or better than Wikipedia:
philosophy course
philosophy Sites
helps in itself because googling but still better.
surprised me prop for all special theory is that I as a small hobby philosopher almost all the points you to find summarized on Wikipedia, for I myself have been thought out, without me ever with lyrics to busy or spoken really in detail about have to. I think it's so beautiful, that my brain can soar to such services - but how to earn your natural philosophers for their money when they deal with things that everyone can think together even if he minded moving up too lazy or stupid is? >
And finally, because it's grad so beautiful fit, nor what the content of the NASA site for those whose English is not good enough to read the page: the NASA in 2000, some "experts" thrown together and where the task given to define the word lives. The results are available on the website. Although I can 'sympathize, because I' with the definition of non ne complete restructuring of the word seems more appropriate, but good. If you want to read it in German, GoogleT.
PS: The coolest family biography of the world is soon fetig, and the Philippine fauna is also this week was.
0 comments:
Post a Comment