going for years now been the public debate about climate change.
There are several models to its consequences, and lately are always discovering new factors that all could do much worse.
But a component is not in any of the forecasts, which often involved, as the IPCC climate report, the direct consequences for predicting the people with.
It acted as if the climate cause more pro, but the world of people in a few decades more or less the same today!
But what is with the technical progress?
without self singularity can be assumed that we have in some years and even decades in some technical options are available that make the climate bearable. At least it is not unlikely. The U.S. government argued precisely with technical solutions to avoid limits for greenhouse gases.
I think not just that they propose this in terms of technology evolving exponentially, but rather from perceived economic interests. But probably they represent a more effective solution than it won, for example Europe.
If one also includes the singularity with, would be a viable short-term manipulation of the climate or the biological adaptation of man possible.
I will not criticize the actions against climate change, but you should make clear first, what benefits are expected to really like this, if today billions of subsidies required in wettbewerbsunfaehige technologies are needed to make it profitable, for which exist in a few years the technology could, they can work efficiently enough by itself. Once that happens, fossil energy sources are rapidly disappearing from the scene, because its price is in the long term can only increase, because their supply is limited. The exponential growth
Enwicklung also implies the exponentially decreasing cost. Subsidies of today can therefore hardly make a difference in development time.
It slowly is time that in politics no longer remain unheeded. Especially now that we start people to negotiate civil, global projects, all others would be ignorant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment